Love vs. Neglect

July 6, 2006

I would rather a child grow up being loved by someone than to go through the system with no one to depend on. That great “backwards” state of Arkansas is seeking a ban on gay foster parents.

I can’t really give a definite explanation on my stance toward gay marriage and the gay agenda period. But I do firmly believe that I would rather let a gay/lesbian/bi/transgendered person adopt a child than to let that child go without love from anyone. Or to grow up on their own in the foster care system.

Who can say what true love is? Is the problem because they feel that child will grow up gay? That’s no more true than saying those raised in a heterosexual family won’t grow up gay. Ummm…obviously that theory is bunk. So why deny a loving family a child based on their sexual identity?

For awhile I’ll admit I was iffy on the thought of gays adopting. I too was bamboozled into believing they would raise gay children. Then I thought to myself…AND? ::Clearing head:: Does that mean that parents who divorce are setting their children up to divorce later one? Does that mean that all parents who cheat on their spouses will raise a child that would do the same? No! We raise our children to be better than ourselves. [I'm not saying hetrosexuality is better than homosexuality], but we raise our children with the best intent possible. At least those of us who are sane.

Being raised by gays doesn’t cause academic problems or gender identity problems, as the state had argued, the Supreme Court said.

Duh.

Latisha Johnson-Wallace

Entry Filed under: United States. .

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Rui Rocha  |  July 7, 2006 at 3:16 pm

    I have a conservative view on gay foster parenting: i don’t look at the family psychological level (of course “being raised by gays doesn’t cause academic problems or gender identity problems”) but at the social level. We all know prejudice remains longer than legislation, that is, I’m a little bit concerned about psychological socialy-oriented effects on the adopted: children being mocked at school… If you ask me what’s most important about this, if the child’s happiness about being adopted while being a kid or a possible sadness generated by a stereotyping society, I sincerely don’t know what to answer, because I don’t know how significant is not-adopted children’s sadness and also how significant is their sadness while being socially mocked in the whole psychological evolution.

  • 2. curtisschweitzer  |  July 9, 2006 at 3:36 am

    Also, doesn’t it seem like, whatever, your opinion on gay marriage, that the appropriate response to the above dillema is to fix the broken system? Arguing the merits of gay adoption is a necessary debate, but the root problem here is that “love vs. neglect” is a false dilemma that should not exist.

  • 3. Max @ Devaneios Desintéricos  |  July 11, 2006 at 8:08 am

    “I have a conservative view on gay foster parenting: i don’t look at the family psychological level (of course “being raised by gays doesn’t cause academic problems or gender identity problems”) but at the social level. We all know prejudice remains longer than legislation, that is, I’m a little bit concerned about psychological socialy-oriented effects on the adopted: children being mocked at school…”

    This kind of position is somewhat a recent tendency in portuguese conservative followers. Instead of assuming a clear conservative opinion and thus its dialectic consequences, they simply neglect the need of fighting for a change in backwards portuguese society and smoothly prefer to stress out possible “psychological socialy-oriented effects” with no actual connection to real life or what so ever…

    Society needs to be shaken up. Let’s all start doing something! Defending gay marriages and adoption is one, among other ways to do it…

    Max Spencer-Dohner
    SWITZERLAND/PORTUGAL

  • 4. Rui Rocha  |  July 11, 2006 at 9:43 am

    Hey Max glad to have you here.

    “Instead of assuming a clear conservative opinion and thus its dialectic consequences, they simply neglect the need of fighting for a change in backwards portuguese society” – I don’t support a conservative vision all the way. What I mean is that i’d like to have some background, some statistic results, in order to express more clearly my opinion. If you ask what i’d vote for now i’d say I wouldn’t change the portuguese law in what refers to this subject – gay couples can’t adopt -, because I tend to look at the both sides of the question and then I tend to put more emphasis on the children’s effects than properly on the grown-up’s effects. Therefore, I look at children’s life more cautiously (you may have read it when I posted about abortion on my main blog…).

    “Society needs to be shaken up. Let’s all start doing something! Defending gay marriages and adoption is one” – Is there such a need? Does society always have to change? Don’t you think that evolution can also bring ‘disevolution’?

  • 5. Max @ Devaneios Desintéricos  |  July 21, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    “Don’t you think that evolution can also bring ‘disevolution’? ”

    No, not at all. At least, not in this case. I do think that it is, above all, a question of human rights… I’m sure Time will stand for this…

    Max Spencer-Dohner
    SWITZERLAND/PORTUGAL

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

Recent Comments

carlos vasco on Portuguese hip-hop
nathalie on Portuguese hip-hop
Sérgio on Portuguese hip-hop
Steph80 on Portuguese hip-hop
Steph80 on Portuguese hip-hop

Archives

Blog Stats